Facebook Hilarity
October 30, 2009 at 5:29 pm 5 comments
I participated in a hilarious conversation on Facebook with my co-workers. I had to share it with you guys!
Nathan Vitatoe beth, do you find Wes’ music and vid clips as distracting and disturbing as I do?
Wes Molebash No.
Nathan Vitatoe you don’t get to vote
Wes Molebash I get three votes. So I guess I win.
Nathan Vitatoe that would be true, but your three votes are only .25 a piece, so you still lose
Beth Klingele Actually you neither one in my voting district so SORRY!
Wes Molebash Just got out of court where a judge ruled that Wes Molebash is equal to three men and one bear. The transcripts are available at the Ross County Court House, just look for Molebash v. Ross County. So, with that settled, my votes are now worth three “normal” votes plus a bear. I don’t know if the bear will give me any edge when it comes to voting, but I’m using him anyway.
Beth Klingele Does he have a hockey stick? Cause that makes all the difference!
Nathan Vitatoe Ohio Revised Code 4369.15b states that ‘all voting or ballot precedings are null and void if the individual in question invokes the vote of a bear or implies the vote of a bear.’ All parties residing within the State of Ohio are subject to the no-bear voting clause which nullifies not only the bears vote, but all of your previous votes as the bear vote holder.
Nathan Vitatoe the chair recognizes Mr. Molebash if he has anything to add…go ahead Mr. Molebash…?…what? can’t hear you…nothing.
Wes Molebash Federal Revised Code 1789J.39-86 (effective June 14, 2007): states cannot discriminate against bears (or any member of the family Ursidae) concerning federal and state affairs including, but not limited to, the issuance of drivers’ licenses, property rights and deeds, and voting rights. . . . Any known discrimination against voting rights of bears reported on or after the effective date of this code shall result in a bear’s vote being doubled as well as all previous votes whether human or bear. – Looks like my votes count as six normal votes and two bear votes. So I still win.
Nathan Vitatoe the FRC mentioned above specifically refers to ‘pinnipeds’ a relative of caniforms in the Ursidae family and cannot be justly applied to caniforms in particular. If your bear is not a web footed mammal then this issue will need to be taken up ‘ab initio’ with the High Council of Office Airwaves for further clarification in which your bear will need to provide counsel ‘pro hac vice’.
Wes Molebash Federal Revised Code 1356Z.45-23 (effective October 9, 2000): one Nathan Vitatoe vote counts as -75 (negative seventy-five) regular votes. – Looks like even if I have 0 votes, it’s still more than -75 votes. I still win.
Nathan Vitatoe that ruling was in regard to Nathan Vitatoe from Djibouti and not that of Nathan Vitatoe from Ohio, USA. Irrelevant and erroneous
Wes Molebash The entire time we’ve been having this discussion I’ve been listening to weird music and watching disturbing video clips.
Nathan Vitatoe I’ll concede that point.
Beth Klingele These bears were drugged and therefore their vote does not count. Please see…ORC 959.05 DRUGGING ANIMALS ENTERED IN COMPETITION PROHIBITED
Entry filed under: Life. Tags: .
1.
Sara(h) | November 1, 2009 at 4:34 am
See, this is why I love Facebook. Even bears get a voice.
2.
chibidani | November 3, 2009 at 1:41 am
AWESOME
3.
Bob | November 5, 2009 at 6:41 am
Oh. My. Lord. And now I know I have to keep better tabs on the links you post to Facebook.
Also, I must ask concerning your friend Nathan here…..he does know that Wes-Bears all carry hockey sticks that are rated at +5 Violence, -42 Youth Destruction, right?
Seems a bit foolish to pick that kind of a fight with you and your bears. I wouldn’t.
4.
Shawn H. Witte | November 6, 2009 at 5:01 pm
Hey, I was just wondering what happened with your short comic of the boy and the dog and the dog was a pictuer and he came to life?
5.
Danica | November 11, 2009 at 2:59 am
Too much law. haha